Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 JUNE 2017

In Unanimous Opinion, SCOTUS Curbs SEC Disgorgement

Pryor Cashman LLP
Pryor Cashman LLP
Contributor
Pryor Cashman LLP

Pryor Cashman LLP

Pryor Cashman is an award-winning midsize law firm headquartered in New York City. With over 200...

View firm profile
Explore more from Pryor Cashman LLP

On June 5, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion holding that disgorgement imposed by the SEC is a "penalty" subject to a five-year statute of limitations.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On June 5, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion holding that disgorgement imposed by the SEC is a "penalty" subject to a five-year statute of limitations. In Kokesh v. S.E.C., the Court rejected the SEC's long-standing position that disgorgement is a remedial sanction that permits the agency to claw-back ill-gotten gains unconstrained by any time limit.

Kokesh is the second time since 2013 that the Supreme Court has issued a ruling curtailing the agency's ability to extract monetary sanctions in SEC enforcement actions, following Gabelli v. S.E.C., in which the Court similarly held that monetary fines are subject to the five-year statute in 28 U.S.C. § 2462.

Disgorgement is a Penalty

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from