Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 JANUARY 2026

GAO Cautions Agencies—Over-Redact At Your Own Peril

Crowell & Moring LLP
Crowell & Moring LLP
Contributor
Crowell & Moring LLP

Crowell & Moring LLP

Crowell & Moring’s Doha office is a full service legal practice that serves as the firm’s regional...

View firm profile
Explore more from Crowell & Moring LLP

While agencies may continue limiting the documents produced (or redacting the documents that are produced) in response to a protest...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

What You Need to Know

  • Key takeaway #1 While agencies may continue limiting the documents produced (or redacting the documents that are produced) in response to a protest, GAO's Tiger Natural Gas decision provides a stern reminder that the agency must nonetheless produce a contemporaneous record that allows GAO to assess the reasonableness of the challenged findings. A sea of black will not answer the mail.
  • Key takeaway #2 Protesters should continue to push back against agency over-redaction or record limitation efforts with citations to such decisions as Tiger Natural Gas  to highlight the issue for GAO.

Bid protest practitioners in recent years have witnessed agencies' increasing efforts to limit the production of documents and information in response to Government Accountability Office (GAO) bid protests—often will little pushback from GAO. This practice has underscored the notable difference in the scope of bid protest records before GAO

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from