Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 JULY 2026

Fourth Circuit Reverses Class Certification In Boeing Securities Fraud Case

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals has established a rigorous five-part test for evaluating damages methodologies in securities class actions, reversing class certification in a case against Boeing where plaintiffs offered only a "menu of options" rather than a specific damages calculation approach. This decision significantly raises the evidentiary bar for plaintiffs seeking class certification in securities fraud cases, requiring them to demonstrate at the certification stage that their damages methodolo

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Short

The Situation: In State of Rhode Island Office of the General Treasurer v. The Boeing Company, No. 25-1492 (4th Cir. July 20, 2026), the Fourth Circuit opined on the level of proof that securities class-action plaintiffs, at the time of class certification, need to provide concerning their damages methodology in order to meet the standard articulated in Comcast Corp. v. Behrend, 569 U.S. 27 (2013).

The Result: The Fourth Circuit held that the plaintiffs' proof was insufficient because their damages expert offered only a "menu of options" rather than a specific methodology shown to be consistent with the plaintiffs' liability theory.

Looking Ahead: This decision establishes the Fourth Circuit as having a rigorous standard for evaluating damages methodologies at the class-certification stage in securities fraud cases. Both within and outside the Fourth Circuit, the Boeing decision will be an important tool for defendants seeking to defeat class certification in securities

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from