Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 OCTOBER 2016

Fifth Circuit Holds Non-Employee Agent Is Protected By False Claims Act's Retaliation Provision

Ropes & Gray LLP
Ropes & Gray LLP
Contributor
Ropes & Gray LLP

Ropes & Gray LLP

Ropes & Gray is one of the world’s most respected law firms, with offices in key business and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Ropes & Gray LLP

The Fifth Circuit issued an important ruling addressing the type of relationship that is required between a relator and a defendant for the relator to have a right to bring a retaliation claim...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On March 9, 2016, the Fifth Circuit issued an important ruling addressing the type of relationship that is required between a relator and a defendant for the relator to have a right to bring a retaliation claim against the defendant under the False Claims Act ("FCA"). In United States ex rel. Bias v. Tangipahoa Parish School Board, 816 F.3d 315 (5th Cir. 2016), the Fifth Circuit reversed the district court's dismissal of relator's retaliation claim because the defendants had not been his employer. In its decision, the panel recognized that the 2009 amendments to the FCA's anti-retaliation provision, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(h), expanded the class of defendants who can be sued beyond employers, and established a framework for how to determine what other kinds of "employer-like" relationships can bring a defendant within the scope of the provision. Id. at 324.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from