Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 APRIL 2008

Federal Arbitration Act: Contract Cannot Expand Scope Of Judicial Review

A recent Supreme Court decision limiting the grounds available for modifying or vacating an arbitrator’s award under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) may give pause to parties contemplating arbitration.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

A recent Supreme Court decision limiting the grounds available for modifying or vacating an arbitrator's award under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) may give pause to parties contemplating arbitration. The FAA provides for expedited judicial consideration of an arbitration award when a party moves for an order confirming, vacating or modifying the award. But this streamlined treatment comes at a cost. In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court resolved a split among the Courts of Appeal in holding that the grounds for judicial review of arbitration awards under the FAA are limited to those stated in §§10-11 of the FAA and cannot be expanded by contract. Hall Street Assoc. LLC v. Mattel, Inc., Case No. 06-989 (Supr. Ct., Mar. 25, 2008) (Souter, J.; Stevens, J.: Kennedy, J.; and Beyer, J., dissenting).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from