Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 JULY 2009

Elected Judges Under Fire: New Supreme Court Case Expands Grounds For Judicial Recusal

On June 8, 2009, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its opinion in "Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co.", No. 08-22 (2009).

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Joshua Mayes
Joshua Mayes

Originally published June 9, 2009

On June 8, 2009, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its opinion in Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., No. 08-22 (2009). The long-awaited decision results from the refusal of West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals Justice Brent Benjamin to recuse himself in a high-profile case. The case stems from the appeal of a $50 million fraud verdict against Massey Coal, which Justice Benjamin voted to reverse. While Massey was preparing the appeal, its CEO, Don Blankenship, spent $3 million supporting Justice Benjamin's 2004 campaign for a seat on the court. Although Caperton has been billed as a case about judicial campaign contributions, Blankenship contributed only $1,000 directly to Justice Benjamin's campaign. The rest of Blankenship's support came in the form of so-called "independent expenditures." (Roberts, C.J., dissenting, Slip Op. at 13.) After winning the election and taking his seat on the court, Justice Benjamin cast the deciding vote

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from