Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 MAY 2016

Dot Your i's And Cross Your t's Before Service: It Could Be Worth $2.5 Million

Butler Snow LLP
Butler Snow LLP
Contributor
Butler Snow LLP

Butler Snow LLP

Some law firms promise client service. Butler Snow delivers on that promise. Surveys by respected...

View firm profile
Explore more from Butler Snow LLP

When De Gazelle Group, Inc. sought to use FedEx for service of process of a Saudi Arabian company, Tamaz Trading Establishment, it reliably arrived at the Saudi Arabian post office.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

When De Gazelle Group, Inc. sought to use FedEx for service of process of a Saudi Arabian company, Tamaz Trading Establishment, it reliably arrived at the Saudi Arabian post office. In fact, a Tamaz agent, seeking legal representation, even called De Gazelle's lawyer stating that he received it. Yet, the Eleventh Circuit recently found that service was improper, likely resulting in a reversal of a $2.5 million default judgment entered in the case.

The Eleventh Circuit based its discussion on the plain words of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(h), which permits the service of corporations outside of the United States "in any manner prescribed by Rule 4(f) for serving an individual except personal delivery." Thus, remaining methods of service are: (1) an internationally agreed upon means of services reasonably calculated to give notice; (2) if there is not an internationally agreed upon means of service then as prescribed by a foreign country's law for service, as

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from