Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 JANUARY 2024

Disinherited Son Can't Challenge Appointment Of Personal Rep

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Contributor
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz is a litigation powerhouse and business accelerator serving leaders in life sciences, private...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Litigation Practice Chair Scott Ford's recent triumph in an Appeals Court case representing Pamela Birkenfeld has been spotlighted by Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Litigation Practice Chair Scott Ford's recent triumph in an Appeals Court case representing Pamela Birkenfeld has been spotlighted by Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly. The Appeals Court ruled that a disinherited son's classification as an 'interested person' under the Massachusetts Uniform Probate Code does not grant him the standing to contest his stepmother's appointment as a personal representative for his father's estate.

Ford said, "Both common law and the MUPC recognize that the circumstances of each case must be considered in the determination of a petitioner's claim of interest. Here, that point is particularly important, given that [Bradley] has waged an unsuccessful three-year, three-court litigation campaign against [Pamela] in an effort to harass her and cause her to spend legal fees unnecessarily."

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from