Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 JULY 2022

Coverage Dispute Under NJ Direct Action Statute Must Be Arbitrated If Required By The Policy

Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti
Explore more from Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti

On July 18, 2022, the New Jersey Supreme Court issued a decision interpreting New Jersey's Direct Action Statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-2, and held that a claimant that pursues...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On July 18, 2022, the New Jersey Supreme Court issued a decision interpreting New Jersey's Direct Action Statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-2, and held that a claimant that pursues a cause of action directly against a carrier for coverage under the Direct Action Statute must abide by the terms of the policy with the insured, including a binding arbitration provision. The decision is important in that it signals the Court's willingness to enforce appropriate arbitration provisions in insurance policies. The case is Crystal Point Condo. Assoc., Inc. v. Kinsale Ins. Co., A-76-20, __ N.J. __ (July 18, 2022).

In this case, the plaintiff Crystal Point Condominium Association obtained two default judgments against defendants in a construction defect lawsuit. It then filed a separate lawsuit against the insurers of those two defendants under the Direct Action Statute. Kinsale moved to dismiss the lawsuit because Crystal Point did not show that either of the defendants

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from