Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 DECEMBER 2021

Court Rules Labor Law 240(1) Applicable To Pulling Forces

Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin
Explore more from Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin

The Appellate Division, First Department ruled that proof that the wooden dunnage pulled the plaintiff down 3.5′ to the loading dock floor was entitled to summary judgment on Labor Law §240(1)

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Adam Calvert
Adam Calvert

Medouze v. Plaza Construction LLC, 2021 NY Slip Op. 06094 (1st Dep't 2021)

The Appellate Division, First Department ruled that proof that the wooden dunnage pulled the plaintiff down 3.5′ to the loading dock floor was entitled to summary judgment on Labor Law §240(1) because the dunnage was inadequate to prevent the plaintiff from falling. The dunnage was securing a bundle of metal frames on a flatbed truck that the plaintiff stepped on and which broke while lifting a 200-300 pound load of other frames. The court ruled that being pulled down, rather than struck by dunnage, was irrelevant as the injury was the result of the application of force of gravity. This case further illustrates the court's willingness to expand protection under Labor Law 240(1), which traditionally applies only to falling objects or falling workers.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from