Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 APRIL 2026

CEMA-ingly Endless Litigation: Brown V. Old Navy Turns 1-Year-Old

Ballard Spahr LLP
Ballard Spahr LLP
Contributor
Ballard Spahr LLP

Ballard Spahr LLP

Ballard Spahr LLP, an AmLaw 100 law firm with 19 US offices, serves clients in more than 50...

View firm profile
Explore more from Ballard Spahr LLP

Today marks the one-year anniversary of the Washington Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Old Navy, LLC, 567 P.3d 38 (Wash. 2025). In response to a certified question from the U.S. District...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Today marks the one-year anniversary of the Washington Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Old Navy, LLC, 567 P.3d 38 (Wash. 2025). In response to a certified question from the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, the court held that the Commercial Electronic Mail Act (CEMA), RCW 19.190.020(1)(b)—an anti-spam statute enacted in 1998 to prevent spammers from disguising junk mail—prohibits “any” false or misleading information in a commercial email’s subject line. That decision has opened the floodgates to a tidal wave of litigation, with plaintiffs shoehorning false advertising theories into this decades-old subject line statute to pursue whopping statutory penalties of $500 per violation.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from