Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 AUGUST 2025

California Supreme Court Allows More Flexibility On Arbitration Fee Payment Rules

Jackson Lewis P.C.
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Contributor
Jackson Lewis P.C.

Jackson Lewis P.C.

Focused on labor and employment law since 1958, Jackson Lewis P.C.’s 950+ attorneys located in...

View firm profile
Explore more from Jackson Lewis P.C.

The California Supreme Court's recent decision in Hohenshelt v. Superior Court addressed whether California's Code of Civil Procedure section 1281.98, which requires the party that drafted the arbitration agreement to pay arbitration fees ...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The California Supreme Court's recent decision inHohenshelt v. Superior Courtaddressed whether California's Code of Civil Procedure section 1281.98, which requires the party that drafted the arbitration agreement to pay arbitration fees within 30 days of the due date or face consequences such as forfeiting arbitration rights, is preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA).

The Court held that section 1281.98 is not preempted by the FAA but clarified that courts should not apply the statute as a rigid, automatic forfeiture rule – as many courts had been doing. Instead, courts may excuse late payments or nonpayments that are not willful, grossly negligent, fraudulent, or due to impossibility.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from