Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 FEBRUARY 2026

AI, Confidentiality, And The Scope Of Privilege

Arnold & Porter
Arnold & Porter
Contributor
Arnold & Porter

Arnold & Porter

With over 1,000 lawyers across 16 offices worldwide, Arnold & Porter is renowned for its...

View firm profile
Explore more from Arnold & Porter

A federal court has ruled that AI-generated content may not be protected by attorney-client privilege or work product doctrine, even when used to explore legal defenses.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Artificial intelligence is now deeply embedded in business operations, with employees across organizations routinely using AI tools in their day-to-day work. On the business side, those tools are used to draft, summarize, analyze, and problem-solve, often outside the direct involvement of legal teams. Those interactions are creating new categories of electronically stored information (ESI). For litigators and discovery professionals, business-side AI use raises important questions about privilege and the discoverability of AI-generated content. A recent decision from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) underscores that AI-generated content may be treated like any other third-party communication and may not be protected simply because it relates to legal issues or ongoing legal proceedings.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from