Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 FEBRUARY 2026

SCOTUS Tariff Decision Impacts And Next Steps

Arnold & Porter
Arnold & Porter
Contributor
Arnold & Porter

Arnold & Porter

With over 1,000 lawyers across 16 offices worldwide, Arnold & Porter is renowned for its...

View firm profile
Explore more from Arnold & Porter

On Friday, February 20, the Supreme Court issued its decision in the consolidated cases of Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump and Trump v. V.O.S. Selections...

United StatesInternational Law

On Friday, February 20, the Supreme Court issued its decision in the consolidated cases of Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump and Trump v. V.O.S. Selections, Inc., holding that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the President to impose tariffs. The case challenged the Trump administration's February executive orders imposing "trafficking tariffs" on imports from China, Mexico, and Canada (targeting fentanyl and illegal immigration) and the April 2025 order imposing sweeping "reciprocal tariffs" on imports from most other countries to address trade deficits. Both the Court of International Trade (CIT) and the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) previously ruled that IEEPA does not authorize such tariffs. Approximately $160 billion to $175 billion in IEEPA tariffs have been collected to date.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from