Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 DECEMBER 2015

Written Description Standard For Negative Claim Limitations

Do negative claim limitations need to adhere to a heightened written description standard?

United StatesIntellectual Property

Inphi Corp. v. Netlist, Inc.

Do negative claim limitations need to adhere to a heightened written description standard? That was the question the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit addressed in an appeal from a inter partes reexamination, rejecting a heightened standard, the Court concluded that "properly described, alternative features are sufficient to satisfy the written description standard of 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 1." Inphi Corp. v. Netlist, Inc., Case No. 15-1179 (Fed. Cir., Nov. 13, 2015) (O'Malley, J.).

Inphi petitioned for inter partes reexamination of a Netlist patent directed to a memory module. After the examiner rejected more than 30 claims as obvious, the patent owner, Netlist, amended the claims to include a negative limitation, after which the examiner withdrew his objections.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from