Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 MAY 2023

Warhol Case Could ‘Rein Back' Courts On Transformative Use: Counsel

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

Joe Gratz and Roman Swoopes discussed the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith that an Andy Warhol...

United StatesIntellectual Property

Joe Gratz and Roman Swoopes discussed the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith that an Andy Warhol print derived from a photograph of the late musician Prince violated copyrights held by the original photographer, Lynn Goldsmith.

Read the full article (subscription required).

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

See more popular content from