Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 JULY 2025

Two Federal Judges Rule In Separate Cases That Training AI Models Using Copyrighted Works Is Fair Use

Two federal judges have ruled that using copyrighted works to train an AI model is a "fair use" under copyright law. A brief overview of the cases and decisions are below.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Two federal judges have ruled that using copyrighted works to train an AI model is a "fair use" under copyright law. A brief overview of the cases and decisions are below.

Kadrey v. Meta Platforms (N.D. Cal. – Judge Vince Chhabria)

Thirteen well-known authors, led by novelist Richard Kadrey, accused Meta of downloading their books from "shadow libraries" and feeding them into its Llama models. Judge Chhabria denied the authors' motion and granted Meta partial summary judgment, holding that Meta's training use was fair as to these plaintiffs.

  • Factor 1 (purpose/character): Training an LLM is "highly transformative" due to turning books into statistical patterns for a tool that can draft emails, translate text, or write code; the commercial motive did not outweigh that transformative use.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from