Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 JULY 2019

TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Mere Descriptiveness Appeals Come Out?

The TTAB recently ruled on the appeals from the three Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusals summarized below.

United StatesIntellectual Property

The TTAB recently ruled on the appeals from the three Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusals summarized below. Let's see how you do with them, keeping in mind that the Board affirms, in my estimation, nearly 90% of these refusals. [Answer in the first comment].

In re International Barrel Distributors, Serial No. 87271602 (June 28, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. Cataldo). [Refusal to register the mark DEEP TOAST for "wood barrels" on the grounds that the phrase is not inherently distinctive (and lacks acquired distinctiveness)].

In re Essenlix Corporation, Serial No. 87467392  (June 28, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Jyll Taylor) [Mere descriptiveness refusal of ISELF-TEST for assays, reagents, and apparatus for medical diagnostic testing].

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from