Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 FEBRUARY 2019

TTAB Finds COMBAT ROSARY Generic For . . . Guess What?

[This guest post was written by Kira-Khanh McCarthy, a 2L at University of Notre Dame Law School].

United StatesIntellectual Property

[This guest post was written by Kira-Khanh McCarthy, a 2L at University of Notre Dame Law School]. The TTAB affirmed a refusal to register COMBAT ROSARY (in standard characters, "Rosary" disclaimed) for "rosaries" on the ground of genericness. Applicant conceded that the term is merely descriptive by amending its initial application to seek registration on the Supplemental Register, but insisted that the mark is not generic after Examining Attorney Jason Paul Blair refused registration under Section 23(c) and Section 45. In re Deus Vult, LLC, Serial No. 87186211 (January 30, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Frances Wolfson).

The Board sought to determine what is the genus of the goods at issue and whether relevant purchasers understand the designation primarily to refer to that genus of goods.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from