Issue preclusion, or collateral estoppel, is a doctrine that
prevents a party from relitigating an issue in a proceeding if that
issue was actually litigated and necessary to the judgment in an
earlier proceeding. Collateral estoppel typically applies to patent
claims if the issues of patentability are identical — e.g.,
same claims, same prior art.1
However, collateral estoppel is not limited to situations
involving identical claims; instead, courts look at the underlying
issues that were litigated and ultimately decided.
Estoppel generally, and collateral estoppel in particular,
involving PTAB proceedings continues to evolve at the PTAB itself
and across district courts.
As the Federal Circuit continues to weigh in on this area, we
are starting to see brighter lines. Two recent cases addressing
collateral estoppel illustrate this evolution. Both cases
considered whether collateral estoppel should apply to factual
findings on prior art from the PTAB in a later