Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 MAY 2016

The "Pot, Kettle, Black" Doctrine

The adage "the pot calling the kettle black"—referring to someone who is guilty of the very thing that he accuses another of—is a bit of equitable common sense that practitioners ought not to forget.

United StatesIntellectual Property

"Oho!" said the pot to the kettle;
"You are dirty and ugly and black!
Sure no one would think you were metal,
Except when you're given a crack."

-Anonymous (excerpt)

The adage "the pot calling the kettle black"—referring to someone who is guilty of the very thing that he accuses another of—is a bit of equitable common sense that practitioners ought not to forget.

In a recent patent case, Tek Global S.R.L. v. Sealant Systems International Inc., the adage proved to be particularly apt.  On remand from the Federal Circuit, Sealant Systems (aka the "pot") objected to, and asked to strike, the supplemental expert report of the plaintiff, Tek Global (aka the "kettle", or perhaps the "tekkle").  Sealant Systems complained that the supplemental expert report went beyond its permitted scope in addressing the Federal Circuit's construction of the disputed claim term "cooperating with."  But too bad for the pot—its own supplemental expert also went beyond the permitted

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from