Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 APRIL 2012

Supreme Court Rules On Patent Use Codes

Ropes & Gray LLP
Ropes & Gray LLP
Contributor
Ropes & Gray LLP

Ropes & Gray LLP

Ropes & Gray is one of the world’s most respected law firms, with offices in key business and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Ropes & Gray LLP

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court decided Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories v. Novo Nordisk.

United StatesIntellectual Property
Alan Bennett
Alan Bennett
Pablo Hendler
Pablo Hendler
Author LinkedIn connections

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court decided Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories v. Novo Nordisk. In a unanimous opinion authored by Justice Kagan, the Court construed the counterclaim provision of the Hatch-Waxman Act, 21 U.S.C. § 355(j)(5)(C)(ii)(I), to permit generic drug manufacturers to challenge in litigation the breadth of a "use code" submitted to FDA by a brand manufacturer to describe its patent coverage for a reference listed drug.

Under FDA regulations, a brand-name drug manufacturer is required to provide a description, known as a use code, of any method-of-use patent it holds that covers the marketed drug. The use code is accepted "as is" by the FDA and published in the Orange Book.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from