Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 JANUARY 2019

Spotlight On Upcoming Oral Arguments – January 2019

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is one of the world’s largest firms focusing on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

The Automotive Body Parts Association ("ABPA") appeals from an Eastern District of Michigan decision granting summary judgment for Ford.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Tuesday, January 8, 2019

Automotive Body Parts Ass'n v. Ford Global Technologies LLC, No. 18-1613, Courtroom 203

The Automotive Body Parts Association ("ABPA") appeals from an Eastern District of Michigan decision granting summary judgment for Ford.  The district court held that Ford's design patents directed to the exterior of an F-150 truck hood and F-150 headlamp were not invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 171 because the claimed designs are ornamental, not functional. 

ABPA argues that the claimed designs are functional and that the design is dictated by the need for the parts to "mate and match" with the other F-150 parts.  ABPA argues that the claimed designs are necessary to work with the combination of other F-150 parts both when originally sold as part of the F-150 truck and when purchased as a repair/replacement part.  Alternatively, ABPA argues that the authorized sale of the F-150 truck exhausts the patent rights in the claimed designs and creates an implied

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from