Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 JANUARY 2018

Spotlight On Upcoming Oral Arguments – January 2018

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is one of the world’s largest firms focusing on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

This appeal arises from a Southern District of Florida decision denying Alexsam's motion to remand to state court and granting summary judgment against Alexsam ...

United StatesIntellectual Property

Monday, January 8, 2018

Alexsam, Inc. v. WildCard Systems, Inc., No. 17-1682, Courtroom 201

This appeal arises from a Southern District of Florida decision denying Alexsam’s motion to remand to state court and granting summary judgment against Alexsam on its breach of contract claim. The district court held that Fidelity’s invalidity counterclaim conferred subject matter jurisdiction and also that Alexsam’s breach of contract claim raised substantial patent issues. Alexsam filed suit against Fidelity for breach of the parties’ license agreement. In its answer, Fidelity alleged that Alexsam’s patents were invalid and sought a declaratory judgment of invalidity and filed a notice of removal. On appeal, Alexsam argues that the mere fact that an issue of patent law is relevant to the contract dispute is insufficient to establish subject matter jurisdiction. Alexsam further argues that Fidelity’s counterclaim was not compulsory, and therefore cannot independently

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from