Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 DECEMBER 2020

Spotlight On Upcoming Oral Arguments – December 2020

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is one of the world’s largest firms focusing on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

The following telephone arguments will be available to the public live. Access information will be available by 9 AM ET each day of argument at...

United StatesIntellectual Property

The following telephone arguments will be available to the public live.  Access information will be available by 9 AM ET each day of argument at: http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/public-access-arguments.

Tuesday, December 8, 2020

Vivint Inc. v. Alarm.com, Inc., No. 19-2438

Alarm.com filed for inter partes review ("IPR") to challenge two of Vivint's patents.  The PTAB found that some of the challenged claims, but not all, were unpatentable.  Both parties appealed to the Federal Circuit.  The court affirmed-in-part and vacated-in-part the PTAB's decision and remanded the case for further proceedings pertaining to a particular claim construction.  On remand, the Board found the remaining claims at issue unpatentable.  Vivint appealed for a second time, but just six weeks after it filed its notice of appeal, the Federal Circuit issued its decision in Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., 941 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2019).  In Arthrex, the court held that administrative

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from