Hyosung TNS Inc. v. ITC, No. 17-2563, Courtroom 402
In this appeal from the ITC, Hyosung seeks reversal of the
ITC's exclusion order for Hyosung's ATMs. Diebold
filed a complaint with the ITC alleging that Hyosung's ATMs
infringe the claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,082,616 ("the
'616 patent") and 7,832,631 ("the '631
patent"). The ITC instituted an investigation based on
Diebold's complaint. At the conclusion of the
investigation, the ITC issued its final opinion finding that
Hyosung's ATMs infringe the patents and that Diebold satisfied
the "domestic industry" requirement under 19 U.S.C.
§ 1337(a)(3).
Hyosung argues that the ITC erred in concluding that the
"domestic industry" requirement was met for the '631
patent. Specifically, Hyosung argues that Diebold failed to
demonstrate that significant or substantial expenditures related to
the '631 patent. Hyosung contends that Diebold's
failure to show any significant expenditures after 2010 is evidence
that any