Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 AUGUST 2020

PTO Issues Guidelines: Admitted Prior Art Cannot Be The Basis Of An IPR Challenge

Under 35 U.S.C. § 311(b), IPRs are only instituted "on the basis of" patents and printed publications. But, occasionally petitioners have relied on statements in a patent's specification

United StatesIntellectual Property

                Under 35 U.S.C. § 311(b), IPRs are only instituted "on the basis of" patents and printed publications.  But, occasionally petitioners have relied on statements in a patent's specification as "applicant admitted prior art" and included that prior art in their grounds in a petition—either alone or in combination with other references.

                On August 18, 2020, the PTO issued guidelines on how Board panels should treat applicant admitted prior art, determining that it does not qualify as "prior art consisting of patents or printed publications," but falls into the category of evidence that the Board may consider for more limited purposes.

                In the reexamination context, the PTO has not allowed applicant admitted prior art to be the basis of a reexamination, but has permitted its use in combination with other prior art patents and printed publications. Consistent with this, the majority of Board IPR panels have determined

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from