The Patent Trial and Appeal Board granted institution of
inter partes review after petitioner submitted a
Sotera stipulation to patent owner via email, several days
after patent owner's preliminary response. The board rejected
patent owner's argument that the Sotera stipulation
was too late, holding that there is no specific time limit for when
such stipulation must be submitted before a decision on institution
is made.
Petitioner filed an IPR petition alleging that certain claims
covering methods for displaying social networking and navigation
information would have been obvious. In its preliminary response,
patent owner argued that the board should exercise its discretion
to deny institution because of its parallel infringement action
involving the same parties and invalidity challenges. A few days
later, petitioner emailed patent owner stating that, pursuant to
Sotera, petitioner would not pursue "any ground that
[it] raised or reasonably could have raised" during