Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 JUNE 2020

PTAB's Obviousness Analysis Inconsistent With KSR

In a decision issued on May 5, 2020, the Federal Circuit reversed a PTAB decision upholding patent claims challenged for obviousness.

United StatesIntellectual Property

In a decision issued on May 5, 2020, the Federal Circuit reversed a PTAB decision upholding patent claims challenged for obviousness. Uber Technologies, Inc. v. X One, Inc., 957 F.3d 1334 (Fed. Cir. 2020). The Board failed to properly apply the obviousness test of KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 421 (2007), which recognized that a person of skill in the art has good reason to pursue the use of a finite number of identified, predictable solutions to solve a problem.

Uber challenged certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,798,593, directed to plotting shared locations on map on a user's mobile device. The Board determined that the prior art did not render obvious the limitation "software ...to transmit the map with plotted locations to the first individual" because one of ordinary skill would not have been motivated to combine a prior art reference in which the locations are plotted at the server and sent to a user's mobile device with a reference in

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from