Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 JANUARY 2015

Pro Se Not Welcome At PTAB

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board refused to allow the inventor to proceed pro se because the real party in interest was a juristic entity.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Shire Development LLC v. LCS Group, LLC

Denying a request from patent owner's counsel to withdraw from an inter partes review (IPR), the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) refused to allow the inventor to proceed pro se because the real party in interest was a juristic entity. Shire Development LLC v. LCS Group, LLC, Case No. IPR2014-00739 (PTAB, Nov. 21, 2014) (Green, APJ).

LCS Group, LLC, a juristic entity, was designated as the patent owner and real party in interest in the Patent Owner's Mandatory Notices and represented by counsel in the IPR proceeding. The inventor of the patent at issue, ostensibly with patent owner's approval, wanted to represent himself in the proceeding. Counsel's withdrawal from an IPR proceeding requires authorization from the Board. 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(e). The Board refused to allow patent owner's counsel to withdraw because the patent owner and real party-in interest was a juristic entity.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from