Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 DECEMBER 2020

Precedential No. 40: TTAB Denies Summary Judgment Motion On "Standing" Issues In PURISIMA Cancellation Proceeding

In this proceeding seeking cancellation of a registration for the mark PURISIMA & Design for wine, Respondent Transcend moved for summary judgment on two grounds

United StatesIntellectual Property

In this proceeding seeking cancellation of a registration for the mark PURISIMA & Design for wine, Respondent Transcend moved for summary judgment on two grounds: that Petitioner Spanishtown (1) is prohibited from seeking cancellation because it is suspended from doing business in its state of incorporation, and (2) lacks "standing" to assert the alleged date of first use underlying its Section 2(d) claim because the mark was used by two individuasl who are not parties to this proceeding. The Board denied the motion. Spanishtown Enterprises, Inc. v. Transcend Resources, Inc., Cancellation No. 92070340 (November 23, 2020) [precedential] (Order by the Board).

1011242a.jpg

"Standing": The Board first observed that the CAFC, in Australian Therapeutics, recently pointed out that the inquiry regarding "standing" "is more accurately referred to as an entitlement to a statutory cause of action." Even more recently, the CAFC, in Corcamore, ruled that the proper analytical framework

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from