Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 JULY 2016

Pre-Claim Construction 101 Motions: Tips For Both Sides

WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Contributor
WilmerHale

WilmerHale

WilmerHale's London office was established more than 40 years ago. With lawyers qualified in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from WilmerHale

Since the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Alice Corp. Pty. v. CLS Bank Int'l on June 19, 2014, there have been a surge of motions filed and granted that have invalidated patent claims for claiming patent-ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101. This

United StatesIntellectual Property

Since the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Alice Corp. Pty. v. CLS Bank Int'l on June 19, 2014, there have been a surge of motions filed and granted that have invalidated patent claims for claiming patent-ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101. This trend and the substance of post-Alice orders have been widely reported. However, there has not been as much focus on the procedural aspects, which can be critical to the success or failure of such motions.

Please click here to continue reading the full text of this article

Originally published by Law360

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from