Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

VIDEO · 28 APRIL 2015

Post-Grant Insights: Obviousness Challenges (Video Content)

Ropes & Gray LLP
Ropes & Gray LLP
Contributor
Ropes & Gray LLP

Ropes & Gray LLP

Ropes & Gray is one of the world’s most respected law firms, with offices in key business and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Ropes & Gray LLP

The practical application of an obviousness challenge is simply this: would a person of ordinary skill in the art find the claims to be obvious, in view of the prior art in front of them.

United StatesIntellectual Property

The practical application of an obviousness challenge is simply this: would a person of ordinary skill in the art find the claims to be obvious, in view of the prior art in front of them.

The biggest challenge with the presentation of an obviousness argument at the PTAB is the page limit. It's the fact that a petitioner has only either 60 pages or 80 pages to explain their story and it sounds like a lot of room, but when it's time to sit down to write these challenges it's very tight and that's the biggest single challenge of presenting an obviousness argument.

How do you win an obviousness challenge before the PTAB? First, extensive and prior art searching. The most powerful challenges tend to be those that present prior art, patents and printed publications that were not considered by the patent office when it examined the original patent. Then, you get great experts; the judges at the PTAB want to hear detailed explanations from highly-qualified individuals. The

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from