Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 SEPTEMBER 2025

Post-Filing Activity May Create Privity Leading To Section 315(b) Dismissal

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

Under Section 315(b), an IPR may be dismissed as time barred "if the petition requesting the proceeding is filed more than 1 year after the date on which the petitioner, real party in interest, or privy of the petitioner is served with a complaint alleging infringement of the patent."

United StatesIntellectual Property

Under Section 315(b), an IPR may be dismissed as time barred "if the petition requesting the proceeding is filed more than 1 year after the date on which the petitioner, real party in interest, or privy of the petitioner is served with a complaint alleging infringement of the patent." 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) (emphasis added). The petitioner bears the burden of establishing that no real parties in interest or privies were served with a complaint more than year prior to filing an IPR. RØDE Microphones, LLC v. Zaxcom, Inc., IPR2025-00231, Paper 33 (PTAB Aug. 21, 2025). "The determination of whether a nonparty is a real party in interest or privy is made as of the date of institution of a proceeding, even if the relationship between the nonparty and petitioner arises after filing but before institution." Id.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from