Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 APRIL 2025

Plaintiff's Declaratory Action Not Anticipatory Litigation Due To Patentee's Delayed Response To Licensing Request

Akin
Akin
Contributor
Akin

Akin

Akin is a global law firm with more than 1,100 lawyers and advisors who pride themselves on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Akin

The Central District of California denied a defendant's motion to dismiss or transfer plaintiff's first-filed declaratory judgement action based on defendant's later-filed patent...

United StatesIntellectual Property

The Central District of California denied a defendant's motion to dismiss or transfer plaintiff's first-filed declaratory judgement action based on defendant's later-filed patent infringement suit in Wisconsin. Though suit was seemingly imminent when defendant advised plaintiff it might be infringing defendant's patents, plaintiff responded by requesting a licensing agreement in lieu of litigation. The court found that plaintiff's action was not anticipatory forum-shopping litigation because plaintiff only filed suit after defendant neglected to respond to its licensing offer.

Plaintiff and defendant are both tool manufacturers. Defendant sent a letter notifying plaintiff that some of plaintiff's products may infringe defendant's tooling patents. When the parties could not resolve the dispute, defendant informed plaintiff that it would sue plaintiff for patent infringement and indicated that it was preparing both state and federal complaints. In response, plaintiff

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from