Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 APRIL 2008

Pfizer Patent For Celebrex® Invalid For Double Patenting

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently ruled that a Pfizer patent covering Celebrex® was invalid for double patenting while affirming a lower court’s decision that two other patents covering the blockbuster anti-inflammatory are valid, enforceable and infringed by the generic manufacturer’s product.

United StatesIntellectual Property

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently ruled that a Pfizer patent covering Celebrex® was invalid for double patenting while affirming a lower court's decision that two other patents covering the blockbuster anti-inflammatory are valid, enforceable and infringed by the generic manufacturer's product. Pfizer, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Case No. 07-1271 (Fed. Cir., March 3, 2008) (Dyk, J.).

The decision arose out of Teva's appeal from a final judgment of a district court, entered after a bench trial, in favor of Pfizer. The district court held that Teva infringed three patents owned by Pfizer: the '823 patent, the '165 patent—covering the active ingredient and a pharmaceutical composition of Celebrex®—and the '068 patent, covering the use in the treatment of inflammation.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from