Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 DECEMBER 2016

One Sale Meets The Lanham Act's "Use In Commerce" Requirement

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is one of the world’s largest firms focusing on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

On November 14, 2016, the Federal Circuit held that a single sale of two hats is sufficient to meet the Lanham Act's "use in commerce" requirement for trademark registration...

United StatesIntellectual Property

On November 14, 2016, the Federal Circuit held that a single sale of two hats is sufficient to meet the Lanham Act's "use in commerce" requirement for trademark registration, potentially contravening longstanding jurisprudence on "token use."

Christian Faith Fellowship Church began selling caps and shirts emblazoned with the phrase "Add A Zero" in January 2005.  In February of the same year, the Church made one sale of two ADD A ZERO-marked hats to an out-of-state resident, and in March, the Church applied for federal registration of the ADD A ZERO mark. 

In 2009, Adidas sought a clothing trademark for ADIZERO, but the USPTO refused its application based on the Church's ADD A ZERO marks. Adidas then sought to cancel the Church's marks arguing, among other things, that the Church had failed to use the marks in commerce prior to registration. The Board agreed, finding the Church's February 2005 sale to be de minimus and not sufficient to satisfy the "use in

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from