Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 MARCH 2014

Narrower Of Possible Claim Constructions Prevails

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit overturned a district court ruling that a claimed range included a margin of error.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. v. Zydus Pharma USA, Inc.

Addressing, among other things, where the upper limit of a claimed range lies for claim construction, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit overturned a district court ruling that a claimed range included a margin of error and that the accused product met the claim recitation.  Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. v. Zydus Pharma USA, Inc., Case No. 13-1406 (Fed. Cir., Feb. 20, 2014) (Prost, J.).

Takeda Pharmaceutical and several related entities own patents claiming the formulation for the brand-name drug Prevacid® SolutabTM, a proton-pump inhibitor sold as an orally disintegrable tablet.  The claimed formulation is directed to drug particles small enough to avoid a feeling of roughness in a patient's mouth upon ingestion.  Zydus Pharmaceuticals received U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) covering a similar formulation, prompting Takeda to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from