Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 MARCH 2014

Motions To Amend In Inter Partes Review Proceedings – A Quick Reference

Board approach to motions to amend highly restrictive.

United StatesIntellectual Property
Christopher McKee
Christopher McKee

Statutory Basis: 35 U.S.C. § 316(d).

Rule: 37 C.F.R. § 42.121.

Guidance: Office Patent Trial Practice Guide (OPTPG), 77 Fed. Reg. 48766-67.

PTAB Decisions: Some discussed below.

1) Board approach to motions to amend highly restrictive. THIS IS NOT LIKE REEXAMINATION.

2) Procedural Requirements/Limitations

  1. Generally only one opportunity to move to amend claims.

    1. To be filed no later than with Patent Owner Response Rule 42.121(a)(1). No opportunity to amend claims with Preliminary Response. Rule 42.107(d).
  2. Must discuss motion to amend with Board in conference call in advance of filing. Rule 42.121(a).
  3. Proposed claim amendments may be contingent or non-contingent -- to be clearly stated in motion. Idle Free Systems, Inc. v. Bergstrom, Inc., IPR 2012-00027, Paper 26 at 10.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from