Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 AUGUST 2016

Light-Emitting Diode Products: Sanctions Imposed For Violation Of Discovery Orders

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

The two respondents violated discovery orders by producing more than 1,000 pages of documents shortly before the evidentiary hearing.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Illustrating the dangers of non-compliance with ITC discovery orders, Administrative Law Judge MaryJoan McNamara, on May 9, 2016, issued the public version of her sanctions order against two of the respondents in Light-Emitting Diode Products, Inv. No. 947. The two respondents violated discovery orders by producing more than 1,000 pages of documents shortly before the evidentiary hearing. Judge McNamara ordered a combination of monetary sanctions, findings adverse to the respondents, and preclusion of evidence supporting respondents' non-infringement arguments.

Background: Discovery Orders

On July 13, 2015, Complainant Cree, Inc. moved to compel all respondents to produce testing documents and provide complete interrogatory responses regarding the accused products (LED bulbs and other LED products). Certain Light-Emitting Diode Products, Inv. No. 337-TA-947. In response to the motion, respondents claimed that they had already produced all responsive documents.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from