Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 JULY 2025

Lexicography: Clear And Unequivocal

Sheppard
Sheppard
Contributor
Sheppard

Sheppard

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more...

View firm profile
Explore more from Sheppard

This Federal Circuit opinion analyzes lexicography in the context of claim construction.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Listen to this post

This Federal Circuit opinion analyzes lexicography in the context of claim construction.

Background

Alnylam Pharmaceuticals owns U.S. Patent Nos. 11,246,933 (parent) and 11,382,979 (child). These patents relate to biodegradable lipids and their use for the delivery of active agents such as nucleic acids.

Alnylam accused Moderna, Inc., ModernaTX, Inc., and Moderna US, Inc. (collectively, "Moderna") of patent infringement in the District Court of Delaware. Specifically, Alnylam alleged that Moderna's activities involving its mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine SPIKEVAX® infringed the '933 and '979 patents.

The "branched alkyl" claim term was at issue with respect to claim construction. Generally, a cationic lipid includes three distinct domains: a head group, a linker, and hydrophobic tails. In one example of a cationic lipid from the specification, each of two hydrophobic tails is made up of an alkyl group R12, a biodegradable group M1, and an

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from