Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 NOVEMBER 2026

Ex Parte Reexamination: The Patent Owner Strategy

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Contributor
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz is a litigation powerhouse and business accelerator serving leaders in life sciences, private...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

As the USPTO tightens restrictions on inter partes review proceedings, patent challengers are increasingly turning to ex parte reexamination as their preferred validity challenge mechanism. This shift requires patent owners to fundamentally rethink their defensive strategies, as reexamination operates under different rules than IPR proceedings and offers unique opportunities for claim amendment and prosecution that demand careful tactical planning.

United StatesIntellectual Property

For more than a decade, inter partes review (IPR) was the tool of choice for trying to invalidate a patent. That is changing. As the USPTO tightens the gate on IPRs, some challengers are turning to an older tool — ex parte reexamination — and patent owners are increasingly finding their patents under attack through a process that is fundamentally different from IPR proceedings and requires fundamentally different strategies.

Reexamination lives in the space between IPR proceedings and traditional prosecution. In this article, we discuss why some are pivoting from IPR proceedings to ex parte reexaminations, how reexamination differs from IPR through a litigation lens, what unique defensive options are available, and which strategies may give a patent owner the best chance of coming out ahead.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from