Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 JULY 2015

Knowledge Is Key To These Pleadings

Turning to CAP's willful infringement allegations, Judge Donato found that Seagate mandates dismissal.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Order Regarding Motions to Dismiss, CAP Co., Ltd.  v. McAfee, Inc., Case No. 14-cv-05068, CAP Co., Ltd. v. Symantec Corp., 14-cv-05071 (Judge James Donato)

Further highlighting the inconsistent treatment of Seagate recently noted on this blog, Judge Donato granted MacAfee's and Symantec's motions to dismiss CAP's willful, induced and contributory infringement allegations, holding that failure to plead pre-suit knowledge of the patents-in-suit precludes recovery. The court held, among other things, that Seagate created a per se requirement that a Patentee move for a preliminary injunction in order to collect post-filing enhanced damages. Judge Donato also held that a complaint is sufficient notice to plead induced and contributory infringement based on post-filing knowledge.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from