Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 OCTOBER 2009

Keyword Advertising After Rescuecom: Predictability Remains Elusive

On April 3, 2009, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Google in a much-anticipated keyword case, Rescuecom v. Google.

United StatesIntellectual Property
Jamie Nafziger
Jamie Nafziger
Jose Hernandez
Jose Hernandez

I. Introduction

On April 3, 2009, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Google in a much-anticipated keyword case, Rescuecom v. Google.1 The result of the ruling, is that most keyword-based trademark infringement cases will no longer be able to be dismissed at the motion to dismiss stage in the Second Circuit. Courts in the rest of the country that had ruled on this issue previously had come to the same conclusion — that alleging that keyword advertising was purchased or sold based on third party trademarks is enough to state a claim against a search engine or a competitor. Despite receiving this adverse ruling in April, in May, Google announced that it would significantly expand its keyword program in two ways. First, it would begin to allow third party trademarks to be used in the ad text of sponsored ads in the U.S. Second, it would expand the number of countries in which it allows the purchase of third party trademarks as keywords from four to 190

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from