Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 JANUARY 2020

Is Your Competitor Objectionable? The Scope Of Immunity Under The Communications Decency Act

Weintraub Tobin Chediak Coleman Grodin Law Corporation
Explore more from Weintraub Tobin Chediak Coleman Grodin Law Corporation

Enigma Software and Malwarebytes develop and sell computer security software nationwide and are direct competitors.

United StatesIntellectual Property

In February 1996, faced with increasing public concern about the availability of pornography on the internet, as well as recent court decisions that seem to deter efforts to filter out such content, Congress enacted the Communications Decency Act ("CDA").  As part of the CDA, Congress granted immunity to internet service providers from liability for actions they took to help users block online content that a user found to be offensive or objectionable.  Congress further declared its goals in enacting the CDA, and its immunity provision, were "to encourage the development of technologies which maximize user control;" "to empower parents to restrict their children's access to objectionable or inappropriate online content;" and "to preserve the vibrant and competitive free market that presently exists for the internet and other interactive computer services."  In 2009, the Ninth Circuit decided the case, Zango, Inc. v. Kaspersky Lab, Inc., 568 F.3d 1169, which held that

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from