Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 FEBRUARY 2011

Inventions With Specific Improvements To Existing Technologies Are Not Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. § 101

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is one of the world’s largest firms focusing on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

In Research Corp. Technologies v. Microsoft Corp., No. 10-1037 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 8, 2010), the Federal Circuit reversed-in-part and affirmed-in-part the district court’s judgment, ruling in favor of plaintiff Research Corporation Technologies, Inc. ("RCT").

United StatesIntellectual Property

Last Month at the Federal Circuit - January 2011

Judges: Rader (author), Newman, Plager
[Appealed from D. Ariz., Judge Jones]

In Research Corp. Technologies v. Microsoft Corp., No. 10-1037 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 8, 2010), the Federal Circuit reversed-in-part and affirmed-in-part the district court's judgment, ruling in favor of plaintiff Research Corporation Technologies, Inc. ("RCT"). Specifically, the Court reversed the district court's entry of SJ invalidating claims in U.S. Patent Nos. 5,111,310 ("the '310 patent") and 5,341,228 ("the '228 patent") under 35 U.S.C. § 101 and denying an earlier filing date to U.S. Patent No. 5,477,305 ("the '305 patent"). The Court affirmed the district court's decision that claims 4 and 63 of U.S. Patent No. 5,726,772 ("the '772 patent") are not entitled to the earlier filing date.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from