Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 APRIL 2018

Injecting Claim Construction Into Motion To Dismiss Analysis Is Improper

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a district court's grant of dismissal as the pleading stage, concluding that the district court ...

United StatesIntellectual Property

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a district court's grant of dismissal as the pleading stage, concluding that the district court inappropriately engaged in claim construction at the pleading stage. Nalco Co. v. Chem-Mod, LLC, Case No. 17-1038 (Fed. Cir., Feb. 27, 2018) (O'Malley, J).

Nalco owns a patent directed to a method for removing mercury, a toxic pollutant, from the flue gas of coal-fired power plants. The claimed method involves reacting halogens (chlorine or bromine) with mercury in flue gas in order to form solid mercury-containing particles that can be filtered from the gas. Because halogens have corrosive properties, however, they cannot be inserted directly into the flue gas. Instead, the Nalco patent claims require injecting into the flue gas a halogen precursor, which will turn into the desired halogen at the high temperatures in the flue. The patent describes a preferred embodiment where the halogen precursor is directly

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from