Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 OCTOBER 2014

How Far Is Too Far? Unreasonable Claim Constructions Can Lead To Sanctions

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is one of the world’s largest firms focusing on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Once a patent infringement lawsuit is filed, much time and effort is devoted by the parties and the court to arrive at the appropriate interpretation of the claims.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Once a patent infringement lawsuit is filed, much time and effort is devoted by the parties and the court to arrive at the appropriate interpretation of the claims.  But how important is it to think about claim construction arguments before filing suit?  In Source Vagabond Systems Ltd., v. Hydrapak, Inc., the Federal Circuit recently reiterated that it is very important for counsel—and the patent owner—to ensure that all infringement arguments raised are based on claim construction positions that are reasonable and legally sound.  753 F.3d 1291, 1301 (Fed. Cir. 2014).  Failure do so, which can also amount to a failure to perform a reasonable prefiling investigation, can lead to a violation of Rule 11 that may result in sanctions including expenses and attorney fees. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from