Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 MARCH 2019

Have You Included Specific Reference To Every Document In Your Priority Claim?

Incorporation by reference is not sufficient to satisfy specific reference to each prior-filed patent application to be entitled to an earlier priority date

United StatesIntellectual Property

Incorporation by reference is not sufficient to satisfy specific reference to each prior-filed patent application to be entitled to an earlier priority date (Droplets, Inc. v. E*Trade Bank (887 F.3d 1309 (2018)). This appeal to the Federal Circuit stems from a dispute between Droplets, Inc. and E*TRADE Bank, over a patent (U.S. Patent No. 8,402,115 ("the '115 Patent")) owned by Droplets. At issue is the effective filing date of Droplets' '115 patent.

The '115 Patent had a claim of priority to another patent (U.S. Patent No. 7,502,838 ("the '838 Patent")), which contained a priority claim to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/153,917 ("the '917 Provisional"), and to an intervening patent ("the '745 Patent"). The claim of priority and a cross reference to related documents were included in the '115 patent specification, col. 1, ll. 5-24, as follows:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from