Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 APRIL 2022

Forum Selection Clauses May Bar an IPR

Haynes and Boone, L.L.P.
Haynes and Boone, L.L.P.
Contributor
Haynes and Boone, L.L.P.

Haynes and Boone, L.L.P.

THE FIRM Founded in 1970, Haynes and Boone, LLP provides a full spectrum of legal services across...

View firm profile
Explore more from Haynes and Boone, L.L.P.

In light of recent Federal Circuit case law, parties involved in licensing, settlement, or confidential business discussions involving patents should carefully consider the impact a forum...

United StatesIntellectual Property

In light of recent Federal Circuit case law, parties involved in licensing, settlement, or confidential business discussions involving patents should carefully consider the impact a forum selection clause may have on the ability to seek an IPR.

Almost anyone can, by statute, request an inter partes review (IPR) of an issued patent, but may limit their right to do so contractually, such as through licensing agreements or non-disclosure agreements (NDAs). These agreements may contain clauses that limit the forum in which any dispute between the parties can be litigated. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) itself has consistently declined to enforce such forum selection clauses, finding that it lacks authority to enforce contracts between the parties, and, in any case, its jurisdiction is statutory and not limited by private agreements between the parties. See, e.g., Rohm Semiconductor USA, LLC v. Maxpower Semiconductor, IPR2020-01676, Paper 15 at 6-7 (PTAB Apr.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from